Your current locationHome page > Information dynamic  > foreign marriage return
  • Foreign lawyers team, connected at home and abroad
  • Tel: 13689535661 (Mr. Zhao)
  • WeChat: sz81197342
  • Address: 21st-26th Floor, HKCG Tower, No.4011 Shennan Avenue, Futian District, Shenzhen, China.

What is the division of property in a foreign country in the distribution of property in a foreign d

source:www.zchlhls.com  |  Release time:2024年08月03日
The issue of property distribution in foreign-related divorces, which involves the distribution of property in a foreign country, faces important challenges in the context of increased marital diversity and international exchanges in the era of globalisation. With the increasing number of cross-border marriages, the ownership of property by spouses in different countries has become a complex issue in divorce. How to deal with the distribution of property in a foreign country in a fair and reasonable manner in the distribution of property in a foreign divorce has become an important issue for the parties, lawyers and related parties.

Property Distribution in Foreign Divorce

Taking Shenzhen as an example, this article aims to discuss the distribution of property in foreign countries in the context of foreign-related divorce, and to study in depth the legal provisions and practical experience in Shenzhen. As the economic centre of China and an important area of international communication, Shenzhen has certain experience and relevant legal framework in the distribution of foreign property in divorce.


How is foreign property distributed in a foreign divorce? Foreign lawyers will provide you with answers

Firstly, we will focus on the importance and complexity of foreign property distribution in a foreign divorce. Foreign divorce cases involve the intertwining of different legal systems, cultural backgrounds, and property types, requiring us to fully understand and respond to the issue.

Next, we will explore the basic principles of foreign property distribution in foreign-related divorce property distribution, including the principles of priority of law, equality and justice. These principles form the basis for weighing the interests of the parties and upholding fairness and justice.

With regard to the legal provisions in the Shenzhen area, we will provide a detailed introduction to the relevant legal provisions and regulations, including the application of foreign-related matrimonial property laws, international judicial assistance and relevant legal procedures. These legal provisions provide guidance and basis for the parties, lawyers and relevant parties, enabling the distribution of foreign property within the legal framework.

By analysing specific legal cases, we will further explore the practical experience and the basis of judgement in the Shenzhen region on the distribution of foreign property in foreign-related divorce property distribution. These cases will help us better understand and address the challenges and solutions to the distribution of foreign property in foreign-related divorce property distribution.

I. Analysis of Legal Cases in Shenzhen

In a foreign-related divorce case in the Shenzhen area, the husband and wife, who were Chinese and American nationals respectively, settled together in Shenzhen after the marriage and owned property and bank accounts in China and the United States respectively. With the breakdown of the marital relationship, the parties needed to resolve the issue of attribution of foreign property in the distribution of property in a foreign-related divorce.

According to the legal provisions and practical experience in Shenzhen, the distribution of foreign property in foreign-related divorce property distribution needs to follow the principle of priority of law, principle of equality and principle of justice. Firstly, the principle of priority of law requires that the attribution of property be determined in accordance with the nationality of the parties, their place of residence and the legal provisions of the place where the property is located. In the case in question, according to the principle of priority of law in China, China could distribute property that was in China.